MISRA C:2012 Addendum 3 defines the coverage classification "Out of Scope" as "Aspects of behaviour are out of scope for C99 and are related to C11." Considering this definition, why is EXP46-C classified "Out of Scope"? It seems, there is no dependency of the rule to C11 at all.
I would actually argue that EXP46-C is covered by MISRA C:2012 essential type model explicitly and strong.
CERT C EXP46-C considered Out of Scope by MISRA C:2012 Addendum 3
Moderators: misra-c, david ward
-
jlerch
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 6:36 am
- Company: Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG
-
misra-c
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:11 pm
Re: CERT C EXP46-C considered Out of Scope by MISRA C:2012 Addendum 3
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The entry for EXP46-C is in error.
You are correct to say that rule EXP46-C "Do not use a bitwise operator with a Boolean-like operand"is covered by MISRA C:2012 rule 10.1 and should be classified as Explicit/Strong.
You are correct to say that rule EXP46-C "Do not use a bitwise operator with a Boolean-like operand"is covered by MISRA C:2012 rule 10.1 and should be classified as Explicit/Strong.
---
Posted by and on behalf of
the MISRA C Working Group
Posted by and on behalf of
the MISRA C Working Group
-
jlerch
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 6:36 am
- Company: Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG
Re: CERT C EXP46-C considered Out of Scope by MISRA C:2012 Addendum 3
Thanks for the re-checking.
Are you planning an updated version of Addendum 3?
Is there a documentation of how MISRA came to their conclusions regarding the coverage decisions in Addendum3? I assume there is, so my question is more whether this is available publicly / on request?
Are you planning an updated version of Addendum 3?
Is there a documentation of how MISRA came to their conclusions regarding the coverage decisions in Addendum3? I assume there is, so my question is more whether this is available publicly / on request?