Moderators: misra-c, david ward
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 1:02 pm
- Company: Axivion GmbH
Just to make sure since several of our customers brought this up lately:
Is the following code compliant on a target where 'int' is 16 bits?
Since the standard C type of '-32768' is 'long' on 16-bit targets, the essential type is the same.
Thus, I believe the code is not compliant.
This seems unfortunate given that the value does fit in the target type; especially since the same code is compliant on targets with 32-bit int.
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:11 pm
You are correct to say that the code is not-compliant.
The C standard type is "signed long", since it is the result of a unary negation on a literal whose type is "signed long".
The essential type and C standard type of an expression may only differ if the C standard type is "int" or "unsigned int". This is not the situation, so the essential type is also "signed long".
Using INT_MIN from the limits.h will return an expression with the correct value and "signed int" type.
Posted by and on behalf of
the MISRA C Working Group