Page 1 of 1

Should #17-0-2 include any non-function identifier?

Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:11 pm
by gs
A discussion of a similar rule for MISRA C concluded the rule was meant to encompass any reserved identifier. While MISRA C++ has excluded functions from this rule and placed their consideration under rule #17-0-3, no mention of standard types (e.g, clock_t) or any other non-function identifier is made as far as I can tell. Should the rule include these also?

Re: Should #17-0-2 include any non-function identifier?

Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:59 am
by misra cpp
The changes to the wording in MISRA C will be reviewed for inclusion in a future version of MISRA C++.